In the sun-drenched plains of East Africa, roughly 6 million years ago, a moment of profound significance unfolded—a quiet revolution in the way life navigated its environment. Amidst a backdrop of shifting climates and expanding savannas, early hominins faced escalating pressures as their forests receded and resources became sparse. It was in this crucible of change that the first tentative steps toward bipedalism emerged, an adaptation that would forever alter the course of evolution.
Picture a small group of hominins, cautious yet curious, as they began to rise from the forest floor onto two legs. This radical transformation was not merely a shift in posture; it was a seismic upheaval that set into motion a sequence of changes that would lead to the very essence of what it means to be human. Bipedalism, the ability to walk upright, offered these early ancestors a critical advantage—freeing their hands for tool use and allowing them to traverse the diverse and challenging landscapes of their African homeland.
The emergence of upright walking is often viewed as a foundational ‘Catalytic’ event in the evolutionary timeline, paving the way for a cascade of innovations that would shape the genus Homo and its home on Earth. The ability to manipulate tools not only enhanced survival but spurred cognitive development, leading to advances in social interaction, planning, and problem-solving. It is this combination of physical and neurological evolution that enabled our ancestors to thrive in a rapidly changing world, marking bipedalism as a pivotal moment in human history.
As we contemplate this monumental shift, we gain insight into how one single adaptation—the choice to walk upright—kindled advancements that would culminate in the rich tapestry of human civilization. The narrative stretches beyond mere survival; it intertwines with creativity, communication, and culture, as these early hominins embarked on a journey that would eventually carry them from the sunlit savannas of Africa to the stars above. This remarkable leap into bipedalism not only redefined their relationship with the environment but also charted a path toward the complex societies we inhabit today, ultimately revealing the extraordinary interconnectedness of evolution and human potential.
Introduction: The Moment Everything Changed
The journey toward bipedalism is marked by a series of intricate biomechanical transformations that collectively enabled early hominins to rise upright and walk on two legs—a pivotal adaptation that would influence their survival and evolution profoundly. At the core of this adaptation lies the repositioning of the foramen magnum, the oval opening at the base of the skull. In bipedal species, this opening shifted from the back to a position directly underneath the skull, allowing the head to balance atop the spine rather than tilt forward. This adjustment was crucial, facilitating a streamlined posture that supported the body’s weight on two legs.
Simultaneously, pelvic restructuring played a vital role in this anatomical revolution. As bipedalism unfolded, the pelvis underwent significant reconfiguration, widening to support the internal organs during upright movement and to accommodate the altered mechanics of walking. The shape of the iliac blades changed, adopting a more basin-like architecture that endowed hominins with greater stability while enabling the necessary leg motion for efficient locomotion. This vital restructuring was complemented by the elongation of the femurs, the thigh bones that became proportionally longer to enhance stride length and balance, further optimizing their ability to navigate the diverse environments of the African savanna1.
As adaptations progressed, the evolution of the foot became another critical component of bipedalism. The development of arched feet enabled better shock absorption and weight distribution, reducing the energy expended in each step. The evolution of the toes, particularly the alignment of the big toe, also shifted from a prehensile function in tree-dwelling ancestors to a more rigid structure suited for push-off during walking2. These anatomical changes collectively enhanced the energy efficiency of bipedal locomotion, allowing early hominins to travel greater distances with reduced fatigue.
Moreover, adaptations were not instantaneous, occurring through a process known as mosaic evolution, wherein different body parts adapted at different rates over millennia. This gradual transformation reflects a complex interplay between genetic factors and environmental pressures, leading to the unique anatomical traits that characterize modern humans today. Importantly, the evolution of the semicircular canals in the inner ear also proved to be essential for maintaining balance during upright movement. These structures, critical for the vestibular system, enhanced equilibrium and spatial awareness, enabling hominins to navigate the varied terrains of their surroundings and engage in activities like foraging and social interaction3.
In summary, the transition to bipedalism was not merely an alteration in posture but a multi-faceted anatomical revolution that redefined the physical form and capabilities of our ancestors. Through evolutionary ingenuity, these adaptations laid the groundwork for profound behavioral and cognitive changes, ultimately transforming hominins into a species uniquely equipped for survival and adaptation in an ever-changing world. Walking upright enabled not just mobility but the creative use of tools and the complex social interactions that would come to characterize human life.
The Science of Standing: Anatomical Revolution
Around 6 million years ago, East Africa was a land of vast open spaces, characterized by savannas dotted with occasional trees rather than the dense forests familiar to many modern primates. The environment during this era underwent significant changes due to climate shifts, transforming the landscape into a mosaic of grasslands, woodlands, and water sources, which significantly impacted the lives of early hominins. These ecological variations created new opportunities and challenges, driving the adaptive evolution of bipedalism among our ancestral species.
Climate fluctuations during this period, particularly the transitions between wet and dry cycles, contributed to what is known as the Green Sahara periods—times when the Sahara was lush with vegetation and supported a range of wildlife. In contrast to today’s arid conditions, this greener phase allowed for an increase in water sources and fertile land, prompting the expansion of emerging hominin populations. As forests receded due to climatic variability and the demands of a growing grassland ecosystem, the early hominins were selected for traits that enabled them to adapt to this new environment, including the ability to walk upright, which offered several advantages for survival1.
Such habitat heterogeneity not only shaped the physical landscape but also influenced resource distribution. With vegetation growing in patches and water sources fluctuating, early hominins who could travel efficiently across varied terrains had a distinct survival advantage. Bipedalism allowed for increased mobility over longer distances, enabling these precursors of humanity to forage for food and carry resources back to their communities. This ability to exploit diverse niches fostered a reliance on both plant and animal resources, facilitating a more varied and nutritious diet which would prove critical for brain development and overall adaptive success2.
Furthermore, as social structures began to form among these early hominins, upright walking made it feasible to engage in cooperative foraging, enhance communicative bonds, and foster group hunting strategies. The ability to see over tall grass enabled hominins to scan for predators as well as locate potential food sources, effectively changing their interactions with the environment. An upright posture facilitated better visual acuity and allowed early humans to maintain vigilance while traversing open areas, gathering in groups to collectively benefit from the abundance of resources offered by the savanna and its fluctuating climate3.
In summary, the environmental dynamics of East Africa 6 million years ago played a crucial role in the evolution of bipedalism. The transition from dense forests to open, tree-studded savannas necessitated agile adaptations to navigate complex habitats, collect food efficiently, and survive in an ever-changing landscape. This crucial interplay of climate and ecology not only shaped the anatomical evolution of early hominins but also set the stage for the emergence of the complex social structures that distinguish humanity today.
African Savanna Stage: The Environmental Context
The evolution of bipedalism in early hominins has long been a subject of intense scientific inquiry and debate, leading to multiple hypotheses attempting to explain why our ancestors took those first significant steps toward walking upright. Each theory presents a compelling narrative, suggesting that bipedalism was not solely the result of a single environmental pressure or adaptation but rather a complex interplay of factors that collectively shaped our evolutionary path.
One prominent explanation is Darwin’s tool-use hypothesis, which posits that the ability to walk upright freed the hands for the manipulation of tools. This hypothesis underscores the role of bipedalism in enhancing survival through improved resource acquisition and social engagement. As early hominins began using tools for foraging, hunting, and defense, their upright posture likely conferred significant advantages, allowing for dexterous hand use that would subsequently lead to significant cognitive development. Evidence from archaeological finds illustrates the connection between tool use and bipedalism, as seen in the tools associated with species like Australopithecus afarensis, which thrived in a varied landscape nearly 3.6 million years ago1.
Another key explanation is the thermoregulation theory, which posits that bipedalism allowed early hominins to minimize solar exposure in the open savanna. Walking upright reduces the body’s surface area exposed to the sun’s rays, decreasing the risk of overheating during foraging and other activities. Coupled with reduced body heat generated from walking, this adaptation would have provided significant benefits in the warm African climate. This theory is supported by studies in modern humans and primates, which indicate that adaptations in locomotion corresponding to changes in environmental temperature can influence survival2.
The carrying hypothesis offers another dimension, suggesting that bipedalism evolved primarily to facilitate the transport of food and infants. This perspective highlights the social and reproductive aspects of early hominin life, wherein the ability to carry resources and offspring while navigating savanna environments would have been advantageous for nurturing and communal survival. The free use of hands not only allowed for efficient carrying but also enhanced the social bonds among group members, fostering cooperative foraging strategies. Evidence supporting this hypothesis includes the anatomical modifications seen in hominins that align with carrying behaviors, thereby reflecting the dual pressures of survival and social living3.
Lastly, arguments for energy efficiency suggest that upright walking is energetically more efficient than quadrupedal locomotion over long distances. Several studies have demonstrated that bipedal locomotion conserves energy, particularly during long-distance travel critical for foraging in scattered resource landscapes. This efficiency would have provided a strong evolutionary advantage, as early hominins needed to conserve energy while maximizing their foraging range4.
Despite these well-supported theories, scholars continue to debate the specific timing and causation behind the emergence of bipedalism. The complexities of the evolutionary process signal that a convergence of adaptations may have facilitated upright walking, rather than a linear progression driven by a single factor. Ongoing fieldwork, fossil discoveries, and advanced archaeological methods are essential in unraveling these interrelated aspects of human evolution, revealing that the path to bipedalism is as multifaceted as the environments that our ancestors traversed.
Through understanding these competing hypotheses, we open a window into the adaptive strategies of early hominins, illuminating not only how they survived but also how they began to thrive within the dynamic tapestry of their ever-changing world.
The Great Debate: Why Walk Upright?
The fossil record offers a remarkable window into the origins and evolution of bipedalism, with key discoveries illuminating the anatomical adaptations that enabled our ancestors to walk upright. One of the earliest candidates for bipedalism is Sahelanthropus tchadensis, a species that lived around 7 million years ago in what is now Chad. This early hominin presents a mix of primitive and derived traits, including a relatively flat face and a small canine tooth size, along with notable cranial features that suggest a foramen magnum positioned favorably for bipedal locomotion. These anatomical traits are suggestive of an adaptation towards upright walking, positioning Sahelanthropus as a crucial player in the evolutionary story of humans1.
Following Sahelanthropus, the genus Ardipithecus, which includes specimens dating from approximately 5.8 to 4.4 million years ago, provides further insights into the evolution of bipedalism. Ardipithecus ramidus, commonly known as “Ardi,” exhibited a unique combination of traits that reflected both arboreal adaptations and those conducive to bipedal locomotion. While its hands maintained adaptations suitable for climbing, the structure of its pelvis suggests a capacity for upright walking. The combination of these traits underlines the idea of a transitional phase in hominin evolution, where locomotion was not yet fully committed to bipedalism but revealed a shift in lifestyle2.
Further cementing the evolutionary path to human bipedalism, the famous Laetoli footprints, attributed to Australopithecus afarensis, date back to approximately 3.6 million years ago. Discovered in Tanzania, these fossilized footprints provide compelling evidence of upright walking among early hominins. The tracks illustrate a modern foot structure, including a well-formed arch and aligned big toe, indicating efficient bipedal locomotion akin to that of modern humans. The pristine preservation of these footprints not only confirms the bipedal capabilities of Australopithecus but also suggests complex social behaviors and group dynamics as individuals traversed the landscape3.
Transitioning into more recent evidence, Homo erectus, which appeared approximately 1.9 million years ago, showcases fully modern bipedalism. This species exhibited an elongated leg structure and a narrower pelvis, optimizing their anatomy for efficient long-distance walking and possibly running. The fossils of Homo erectus reveal a significant leap in anatomical adaptation, including a more advanced cranial capacity linked to cognitive development and tool use. This evolution further underscores the importance of bipedalism in facilitating new behavioral strategies that would dramatically reshape human survival and adaptation4.
However, the interpretation of fossil evidence related to bipedalism is often fraught with debate. A notable controversy arises with the discovery of the Trachilos footprints on the Greek island of Crete, which some researchers argue could suggest that bipedalism emerged much earlier than previously believed, potentially influencing discussions of human origins in Europe. If these footprints indeed belong to early hominins, they may imply that bipedal locomotion developed in varied geographic contexts, rather than being confined to East Africa alone. Such findings challenge the prevailing view of a linear path to bipedalism originating from a single region5.
In summary, the fossil evidence tracing the evolution of bipedalism is rich and complex, showcasing a gradual adaptation spanning millions of years. From the early traits observed in Sahelanthropus and Ardipithecus to the definitive footprints of Australopithecus afarensis and the advanced morphology of Homo erectus, each discovery sheds light on the biological and environmental factors that prompted our ancestors to rise upright and embark on a path that would ultimately lead to the diverse range of human cultures and societies we see today. As new discoveries continue to emerge, the conversation around bipedalism’s geographic origins and evolutionary significance will undoubtedly evolve, enriching our understanding of human ancestry.
Following the Footprints: The Fossil Evidence
The evolution of bipedalism did not just alter the way our ancestors moved; it also fundamentally catalyzed cognitive evolution by freeing the hands for tool manipulation and social gesturing. As early hominins transitioned to walking upright, they liberated their upper limbs, enabling the development and use of tools that would play a crucial role in their survival and social interactions. This newfound dexterity paved the way for more complex behaviors, fostering a sophisticated relationship between manual skills and brain development. Tools became essential not only for foraging and hunting but for creating social bonds, as cooperative activities required communication and precision in gestures1.
Accompanying this physical transformation were significant changes in neurological processing. The act of using tools necessitated enhanced hand-eye coordination, which likely led to the reorganization of neural pathways in the brain. As hominins engaged in increasingly complex tasks, the specialized areas within the brain associated with motor control and spatial awareness evolved. Research indicates that regions such as the primary motor cortex, responsible for dexterity, and the parietal cortex, involved in sensory integration and spatial reasoning, expanded in size and complexity. This neurological rewiring created a feedback loop where enhanced cognitive capabilities improved the efficacy of tool use, pushing early humans towards greater cognitive sophistication2.
Moreover, the energy savings inherent in efficient bipedal locomotion opened up new avenues for evolutionary advancements. Walking on two legs is energetically more viable over longer distances compared to quadrupedalism, allowing early hominins to forage over larger areas without exhausting their resources. This freed energy could then be redirected to support a growing brain, which is energetically expensive to maintain. Studies suggest that with bipedalism, our ancestors could allocate more of their available energy toward developing larger, more complex brains, which offered significant survival advantages in terms of problem-solving, social dynamics, and environmental interaction3.
The intricate interplay between bipedalism and cognitive evolution may explain the rapidly advancing capabilities of hominins as they adapted to their environments. The combination of freed hands, enhanced sensory integration, and a more substantial energy budget for brain development paved the way for the sophisticated social structures, tool-making innovations, and abstract thinking that characterize modern humans. Thus, bipedalism laid not only the physical groundwork for our species but also the cognitive foundations that would enable the rise of culture, language, and philosophy, fundamentally altering the course of human history. As we explore the implications of these changes, we recognize that the march toward modernity was as much a journey of the mind as it was of the body.
From Feet to Philosophy: The Brain Connection
Bipedalism set in motion a remarkable cascade of evolutionary innovations that would fundamentally reshape not only the trajectory of human evolution but also the fabric of life on Earth. The transition from a quadrupedal to a bipedal stance was not merely a change in locomotion; it catalyzed a series of interconnected developments, starting with the emergence of tool use. As early hominins gained the ability to walk upright, their freed hands became adept at crafting and manipulating tools, which directly influenced dietary practices. The capacity to create sophisticated tools enabled more efficient hunting and gathering, allowing early humans to access a wider range of foods, including meat and other nutrient-dense resources. This dietary shift significantly contributed to the development of larger brains, as energy-rich foods supported cognitive growth and complexity1.
In turn, tool use and newfound dietary diversity necessitated increased social cooperation among early humans. The complexities of hunting and gathering large game or foraging over expansive landscapes required collaboration and communication within groups. This social cooperation fostered the development of communal strategies and altruistic behaviors, creating networks of support that enhanced survival rates. As groups began to rely on each other for resource sharing, social structures became more intricate, leading to the formation of social bonds and communal living. Such cooperation laid the groundwork for the emergence of early cultures, characterized by shared norms and collective goals2.
Significantly, bipedalism also influenced the evolution of human language. With the freed hands and the restructured throat anatomy associated with upright walking, early hominins developed a more versatile vocal apparatus capable of producing a range of sounds. The need for coordination in cooperative hunting and gathering created a compelling impetus for improved communication, ultimately leading to the development of complex languages. This capacity for language not only facilitated immediate social interactions but also allowed the transmission of knowledge, fostering cultural evolution through storytelling, ritual, and shared experiences3.
The interplay of these advancements represents an irreversible paradigm shift in human evolution, resulting in profound changes to the way our ancestors lived and interacted with the world. Bipedalism acted as a catalyst for technological innovation; the mastery of tool-making coupled with advanced communication gave rise to an incredibly adaptive and innovative species. Over time, as human societies progressed, these foundations allowed for the genesis of formalized culture, intricate technologies, and the complex societies we observe today.
In summary, bipedalism initiated a transformative cascade of evolutionary consequences—each development intricately linked and amplifying the others. From dietary changes made possible by tool use to the rise of language and social cooperation, these innovations were not merely incidental; they became integral aspects of what it means to be human. This evolutionary journey, rooted in the ability to walk upright, represents a fundamental shift that irrevocably altered the course of life on Earth, propelling our species toward the remarkable capabilities and cultural richness seen in modern humans.
The Cascade Effect: Bipedalism’s Revolutionary Consequences
Imagining a world where bipedalism never evolved poses intriguing questions about alternative evolutionary trajectories and the potential adaptations of early primates. In this counterfactual scenario, if our ancestors had remained on all fours, it is likely that they would have developed enhanced arboreal skills, focusing on life in the trees rather than adapting to a terrestrial lifestyle. This continued reliance on a quadrupedal stance would have necessitated refined locomotion atop branches, potentially leading to the evolution of more specialized limb structures and grasping abilities, maximizing their agility and efficiency in navigating complex arboreal environments1.
In this altered path, social structures might have evolved differently as well. If primates remained primarily arboreal, they may have formed smaller, more tightly knit social groups that emphasized agility and stealth over the cooperation required for large-scale hunting and gathering. Such groups could be governed by different social hierarchies, with a stronger emphasis on competition for resources within a limited vertical space. This would lead to adaptations favoring communication methods that enhance subtlety and quick responses, rather than the elaborate forms of language that were influenced by bipedalism. Just as arboreal monkeys rely heavily on vocalizations and body language to communicate, their social structures might prioritize closely-knit relationships over broader networks found in ground-dwelling species2.
Furthermore, without the advantages of bipedalism, the cognitive strategies of these non-upright primates might have evolved along completely different lines. Intelligence in humans is deeply intertwined with the capacity to manipulate objects and engage in complex social interactions, facilitated largely by free hands and upright posture. If these early primates developed their intelligence primarily within arboreal settings, their cognitive evolution could have produced heightened spatial awareness and memory, essential for maneuvering through the trees and remembering the locations of resources3. Such non-linear adaptations might include advanced navigational skills or problem-solving capabilities focused on environmental challenges unique to a three-dimensional habitat.
Considering the possibility of intelligence comparable to humans arising via this alternative evolutionary path raises questions about the types of cognitive abilities that might develop. While it is conceivable that complex forms of intelligence may still evolve, they would be shaped by different selection pressures. Social cooperation, tool use, and communication methods would each take on new dimensions, potentially resulting in highly specialized cognitive traits that differ from those associated with human evolution. Therefore, while it is difficult to map the specifics of such an alternative evolutionary landscape, it is plausible that comparable intelligence could emerge, albeit through distinct mechanisms and characteristics that favor an arboreal lifestyle.
Ultimately, the absence of bipedalism would set the stage for a radically different evolutionary history, impacting not only the anatomy and behavior of the primates that emerged but also the entire trajectory of life on Earth. This thought experiment underscores the profound significance of upright walking, not just in shaping humanity’s physical form and cognitive capabilities but also in influencing social structures, environmental adaptations, and the course of evolution itself. In the vast tapestry of life, bipedalism was not just a step forward; it was a leap that led to an entirely new narrative of existence.
What If We Had Remained on All Fours?
Bipedalism, the hallmark feature of human evolution, presents a complex interplay of benefits and costs that resonate deeply in our modern lives. While walking upright has enabled humans to run marathons, traverse diverse terrains, and explore every corner of the planet, it has also brought with it a range of physical challenges. The most common complaints associated with our bipedal stance are musculoskeletal disorders, particularly chronic back pain and knee problems. As our spines and joints face the stresses of bipedal locomotion, the risk of injuries increases, resulting in a public health crisis that is exacerbated by sedentary lifestyles and modern conveniences1.
Our upright posture, while facilitating prolonged walking and running, places significant strain on structures like the intervertebral discs in our spinal columns. This leads to common ailments, such as herniated discs and osteoarthritis, particularly in the knees2. The design flaws in our anatomy—such as the curved lumbar spine and narrow pelvis—showcase the evolutionary compromises that allow for both bipedal locomotion and childbirth. As researchers delve into the intricacies of these evolutionary adaptations, insights into the underlying causes of pain have begun to inform preventive and therapeutic approaches in modern medicine, emphasizing the importance of ergonomics and physical fitness to mitigate the adverse effects of our upright stance3.
Conversely, the advantages of bipedalism have manifested in remarkable ways, fundamentally shaping human capabilities. Our ability to cover vast distances efficiently, as demonstrated by modern endurance athletes, is a testament to the evolutionary adaptations that favor running and walking. Bipedalism has not only supported our survival as foragers and hunters but has also enabled accomplishments in exploration and transportation that define our species. The unique biomechanics of upright walking allow humans to traverse diverse environments with unmatched versatility, opening the world for exploration and cultural exchange4.
Understanding our bipedal heritage also plays a crucial role beyond Earth, particularly as human endeavors expand into space exploration. In microgravity environments, the human body undergoes various adaptations, often leading to muscle atrophy and bone density loss. Insights from our bipedal anatomy inform how we approach physical training in space to mitigate these effects. Programs that simulate resistance training and optimize nutritional intake strive to preserve musculoskeletal health, underscoring the importance of understanding our evolutionary history as we adapt to the challenges of new gravitational environments5.
In summary, bipedalism embodies an evolutionary trade-off that has brought both significant advantages and considerable challenges. While it equips modern humans with unmatched capabilities for locomotion and exploration, it also sets the stage for a plethora of musculoskeletal issues. By understanding the complexities of our bipedal heritage, we can better address these challenges through innovative medical treatments, effective athletic training, and adaptive technologies for future ventures into space. Ultimately, recognizing the dual nature of bipedalism offers a pathway to embrace its promise while managing its costs, ensuring that we continue to thrive in our uniquely upright existence.
Modern Echoes: The Price and Promise of Walking Upright
The journey of humanity can be traced back to a singular, transformative adaptation: the remarkable shift to bipedalism that occurred approximately 6 million years ago. This foundational change in locomotion set in motion a series of evolutionary events that would shape our species’ trajectory in ways unimaginable at the time of our early upright ancestors. Bipedalism did more than simply alter the way our ancestors moved; it unlocked a potential for innovation, survival, and social complexity that defined humanity’s path from the African savannas to the vastness of outer space1.
With the adoption of upright walking, early hominins gained enhanced mobility and freed their hands for tool-making, which marked the beginning of our relationship with technology. This led to the creation of stone tools, the development of social structures, and the communication techniques that would evolve into complex languages. As these early humans adapted to their environment, they cultivated foraging, collaborative hunting strategies, and the ritualistic behaviors that formed the core of emerging cultures. The shift from trees to open landscapes was complemented by advancements in tool use, which enabled them to thrive in diverse habitats2.
Bipedalism’s importance reverberates through the ages, ultimately propelling humanity beyond the confines of Earth. The physical and cognitive changes that accompanied upright walking laid the groundwork for the later development of agriculture, the establishment of civilizations, and the relentless pursuit of knowledge. From simple stone tools, the ingenuity of our ancestors blossomed into the complex technologies we see today, including the smartphones that connect us globally and the spacecraft we design to explore our universe3.
As we stand at the edge of space exploration, with aspirations to colonize other planets and unlock the secrets of the cosmos, we witness the legacy of those first upright steps. The adaptive strategies and innovative spirit that arose from bipedalism have culminated in humanity’s unique position as a spacefaring species. From navigating the challenges of living on Earth to contemplating life on Mars and beyond, our journey is a remarkable testament to the power of evolutionary innovation.
In concluding the story of bipedalism, we must recognize its profound significance in enabling not just our survival but also our legacy. Each upright step taken by our ancestors initiated a cascading series of adaptations and innovations that have allowed us to forge our environment, share knowledge across generations, and reach for the stars. As we reflect on this evolutionary milestone, we understand that the path from the African savanna to the lunar landscape is marked by an enduring quest for exploration and understanding, a journey that continues to define what it means to be human.
Conclusion: The First Steps That Led to the Stars
- PMC1571304: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1571304/
- Royal Society Publishing: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2020.0483
- PMC2409100: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2409100/
- Frontiers in Psychology: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00496/full
- Nature: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07152
- PNAS: https://www.pnas.org/content/108/20/8132
- Science: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1154857
- Nature: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature06665
- ScienceDirect: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040618219300633
- JSTOR: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25635965
- PMC5155887: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5155887/
- Science: https://www.scienced.org/doi/10.1126/science.15489
- Science: https://www.scienced.org/doi/10.1126/science.1045206
- PNAS: https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1402749111
- ScienceDirect: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027716306356
- Journals.co.za: https://journals.co.za/doi/pdf/10.10520/EJC-107401d
- PMC6310003: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6310003/
- Science: https://www.scienced.org/doi/10.1126/science.1141931
- PMC4190635: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4190635/
- SAGE Journals: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1756285612459563
- Journals.co.za: https://journals.co.za/doi/pdf/10.10520/EJC-8a4384b936
- Science: https://www.scienced.org/doi/10.1126/science.1168607
- Nature: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-26271-0
- PMC4561991: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4561991/
- Nature: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature19117